Angela Levin reports on Meghan Markle’s horror at her car crash CBS Sunday Morning interview with Jane Pauley, revealing: “She was screaming at producers and very annoyed about what they asked her. She couldn’t contain her anger and fury.”

She also says that Meghan “couldn’t stand Harry speaking” during their first joint sit down since Oprah Winfrey, saying: “She didn’t want him to talk.”

Weighing in on their marriage problems, Prince Harry’s biographer adds: “They’re really angry at each other but they can’t really separate. He’s in a very very bad way.”

In a recent CBS interview, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry displayed deep-seated emotions that have ignited widespread discussion. Meghan’s intense anger, particularly directed at Harry’s comments, and Harry’s visible unhappiness throughout the interview raised concerns about their mental well-being and the state of their relationship.

Observers noted a lack of warmth between the couple, suggesting underlying tensions that may be straining their partnership.

The interview brought Meghan’s visible discomfort to the forefront, particularly in response to the questions posed by the producers. This discomfort seemed to exacerbate as the interview progressed, culminating in a heated response after the cameras were turned off.

Harry’s demeanor throughout also suggested a sense of loss and unhappiness, reflecting a notable shift from his usual public persona.

Their relationship dynamic appeared strained, with signs of control and lack of support emerging during their interactions.

Meghan’s subtle dominance over Harry, as evidenced by her physical gestures during public appearances, highlighted the tension within their partnership. Speculation about Meghan’s motivations, including a potential desire for attention and victimhood, complicates the public’s perception of her struggles, despite her privileged lifestyle.

The interview also touched upon critical issues surrounding mental health. The importance of seeking mental health support, especially during pregnancy, was emphasized. Despite having unique resources, royal family members often grapple with seeking help openly due to stigma and fear of judgment.

Pregnancy can bring significant emotional changes, making regular mental health check-ins essential, yet public appearances often mask true emotional states.

Criticism has emerged regarding the authenticity of Meghan and Harry’s emotional distress claims. Observations from their public appearances suggest inconsistencies in their narrative, raising questions about the genuineness of their reported experiences.

The tension between their public personas and the personal struggles they claim to face underscores the complexities of media portrayals and personal narratives.

Further scrutiny has centered on Meghan and Harry’s public image and sincerity.

Critics argue that their focus on personal narratives appears self-centered and question their ability to empathize with families facing tragedies.

Their advocacy efforts, particularly regarding a better internet, have been overshadowed by associations with controversial figures, leading to accusations of hypocrisy.

The couple’s apparent discomfort during emotionally charged discussions has further strained their credibility as advocates, highlighting a perceived lack of genuine support for grieving families.

Overall, the interview has intensified public scrutiny of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, shedding light on the complexities of their relationship and the challenges of navigating personal and public expectations in the realm of mental health and advocacy.