Archbishop Justin Welby recently criticized Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for their perceived disrespect towards the late Queen Elizabeth, fueling ongoing public debate about the couple’s actions and the implications for their royal titles. Although the Archbishop did not mention them by name, his commentary was widely interpreted as addressing the couple, especially following their publicized exit from royal duties and the controversies that have followed them.
The criticism comes at a time of reflection and transition for the royal family after Queen Elizabeth’s death. The Archbishop’s comments emphasize themes of betrayal and the importance of duty and service to the monarchy, contrasting the behavior of Harry and Meghan with that of Prince William and Kate Middleton. William and Kate are often held up as exemplars of royal grace and responsibility, maintaining composure amidst challenges while continuing their roles in public service.
Supporters of the monarchy argue that Harry and Meghan’s actions—such as their public interviews and media ventures—demonstrate a departure from the traditional values of royalty. Many believe that by distancing themselves from royal duties, while still holding onto their titles, Harry and Meghan have benefitted from their royal status without fulfilling the associated responsibilities. This sentiment has led to increasing calls for the couple to be stripped of their titles, with critics suggesting that their behavior tarnishes the monarchy’s image.
Meanwhile, Meghan’s influence on Harry and the growing rift between him and the rest of the royal family, particularly his brother William, has been a point of contention. Some commentators portray Meghan as a disruptive force within the family, contrasting her desire for attention with Kate’s quiet dignity and focus on royal duty.
King Charles’s leadership in navigating these family dynamics has also been highlighted. His approach has prioritized the monarchy’s stability and public image, showing a willingness to make difficult decisions for the sake of the institution. As public opinion continues to shift, there is speculation that Charles may consider taking formal steps to address Harry and Meghan’s titles, signaling a new chapter for the monarchy focused on accountability and service.
In contrast, Harry and Meghan’s quest for privacy, while remaining in the public eye, continues to generate criticism. The couple’s choices, particularly in terms of media engagement, are seen by many as contradictory, with Meghan often viewed as using her platform for personal gain rather than embodying the values expected of royalty. This ongoing saga raises broader questions about the role of the monarchy in modern society and the balance between personal freedom and public duty.
