The palace gates are shaking with the latest royal bombshell – King Charles III has reportedly demanded that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry provide proof of the existence of their children Archie and Lilibet.

The shocking move comes after years of speculation and rumors that the Sussex children are simply fabrications, created as part of Meghan’s elaborate schemes to boost her profile and extract more money and titles from the Royal Family.

King Charles III has issued a demand for proof regarding the existence of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s children, Archie and Lilibet, amid persistent skepticism about their reality.

This unexpected demand could have serious implications for the Sussexes, potentially leading to the loss of their royal titles and legal consequences if they fail to provide sufficient evidence.

Public doubt about Archie and Lilibet has continued despite numerous social media posts showcasing the children. The lack of independent verification has only fueled speculation about their authenticity.

Insiders suggest that King Charles is particularly frustrated by what he perceives as Meghan’s exploitation of her children for personal gain, which has heightened tensions within the royal family.

Should Meghan and Harry be unable to substantiate the existence of their children, they face potential legal repercussions, including charges of fraud.

This scenario also threatens their financial interests stemming from various deals. Meghan’s efforts to tightly control the narrative around her children and avoid public scrutiny complicate the situation, making it challenging to address the doubts.

The Sussexes’ withdrawal from royal duties has intensified scrutiny, and without royal resources, maintaining the perceived legitimacy of their children becomes increasingly difficult.

Royal experts believe that a public appearance by Archie and Lilibet might be the most effective way to counter skepticism. However, Meghan’s history of managing her public image raises concerns about the credibility of any evidence provided.